June 23, 2009
By Jon Silberg
Throughout his career, cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle has experimented with new technologies, so his recent outings with the RED ONE for the BBC One series Wallander and Danish director Lars von Trier's controversial feature Antichrist
didn't intimidate him in the least. Mantle, the recipient of
cinematography awards worldwide this year (including Academy and ASC
awards) for his work on Slumdog Millionaire, feels equally comfortable shooting features on 35mm and 16mm film, Mini DV, HD and a prototype of the Silicon Imaging SI-2K digital camera, which he used in conjunction with 35mm film on Slumdog.
| |
 |
|
|
|
The cinematographer's first encounter with the RED Digital Cinema camera was on the BBC version of Wallander,
a successful Swedish series about the eponymous brooding Scandinavian
detective, played by Kenneth Branagh. As he would for any new format, Mantle
did his research and spoke to other cinematographers and post
professionals, and then did his own testing, so he could start rolling
on day one with a clear sense of the imager's strengths and weaknesses,
from set through the mastering stage. As everyone who's used the RED is aware, the camera in its current
iteration is very much balanced for daylight. Essentially, 5000°K is
the agreed-upon sweet spot, where it can capture imagery with the least
noise. The closer the lighting got to tungsten's 3200°K, the noisier
the image became. "I didn't dare go full tungsten on any of the
lights," Dod Mantle says of his lighting on Wallander. "I
brought a full HMI package, and when I did use tungsten lights, I would
put some blue [gel] on them. That would give me some separation of the
warmer and cooler portions of the frame in post when I wanted it, but I
was still very cautious where tungsten lighting was concerned."
Also, while Dod Mantle shared many of his colleagues' positive views
about RED's ability to hold shadow detail, he doesn't find that to be
the same thing as a truly faster sensor; he's not going to put all his
detail in the shadow portion of the exposure. "The camera is slow," he
notes. "Officially they say it's [EI] 320. Some say it's really 200.
I'd say it's in between at 250. What I'm looking for is a camera with
enhanced highlights and the tolerance of shadows that RED has. I had
similar issues on Slumdog," he notes of his work with the
SI-2K. "As soon as I got into difficult lighting situations, I would
switch to shooting 500-speed film, pushing it a stop, rating it at 800
or 1000, and I'd be back in business."
The speed of the sensor, he elaborates, "is still a major issue, and
it becomes an economic issue because if you do get stuck and have to
bring more light in to get an exposure, you're using time that could be
creative time."
If Dod Mantle could change one thing about the current RED
configuration, it would be its ergonomics and bulk when decked out with
the requisite peripherals. "I'm not knocking it," he notes, "but film
cameras, after 100 years of evolution, sit on your body better than
this camera does now. It's a natural part of evolution, and I'm sure
things will get better. It's heavy and there's a lot of heat and noise
coming out of it—this is really quite striking when you have it up
against your eye 10 to 12 hours a day."
Aesthetically, the producers of Wallander wanted both the Swedish and British versions to possess a more modern, somewhat freer aesthetic than had the original Swedish Wallander
series earlier in this decade, but within that decree, the filmmakers
were still encouraged to let the individual 90-minute episodes' style
differ somewhat from one another in order to reflect each one's story.
Dod Mantle, who shot the first and third episodes of the
three-installment season, explains his approach to the first episode,
which starts out in a lush field in which a young girl mysteriously
immolates herself right in front of a horrified Wallander.
"The first episode is the most stylized, and I think that was
important to help the series get off the ground," the DP notes,
confessing, "I found that the other one I shot, the third of the three,
was a bit less successful. I think we pinched our budget to make the
first one more cinematic and paid the price on the last, where we had
to shoot a few more talking heads than I like. I am not a fan of
talking head television. I like a show like 24, where they work hard to keep an aesthetic. Of course, they have a much bigger budget than we did."
Scenes for Wallander were generally covered with two
cameras—"We would never have gotten through it on that schedule
otherwise," Dod Mantle observes—and camera placement was dependent on
blocking. "Sometimes I'd have two cameras [on approximately the same
axis] doing the wide and the close, and others I'd cross shoot, so long
as the lighting worked. There's no problem with sidelight. It's just
about lifting up the unlit side to balance it out a little bit. I
generally don't shoot in completely opposite directions."
| |
 |
|
|
|
Where possible, Dod Mantle likes to use the B-camera to get
something completely different and unexpected from what the A-camera is
covering. "I've developed a kind of shooting philosophy for a lot of my
work where I can have one to four cameras doing different things at a
given time," he explains. "I used it a lot on Slumdog and Last King of Scotland,
where everything is still under a controlled environment and lit
properly, but this helps me get more material and the kinds of things
we probably wouldn't shoot otherwise. We'll get cutaways of little
details or a reflection somewhere—risky things that you never get time
to stage. I might do a medium shot and then the close-up and mess
around with the axis and do naughty things you're never supposed to do.
A good, creative editor who understands why you're doing it loves those
kinds of things."
Having worked with it now for his two Wallander episodes and on the mostly handheld Antichrist,
Dod Mantle places the RED camera very high on the list of digital
cameras he's used, though he's by no means ready to abandon film
acquisition for feature films. He says of his observations during the
coloring sessions of the DPX files (made from .r3d originals), "It's
not equivalent to doing a DI with full-gate, well exposed 35mm film,
but I thought this was a bump up from the Sony [HDCAM] and Panasonic
[DVCPRO] formats I've shot on before. Certainly it's better than the
Mini DV I used on the zombie flick 28 Days Later. I think
that right now [RED] is better for the DP/director and people with
smaller voices and less money to get comparatively high-resolution
imagery that they can sell to networks than as a serious competitor to
film.
"I trained classically," he sums up. "I studied sensitometry in the
dark room with black-and-white and color film. I sometimes pine for the
older formats. Sometimes I'm sitting on a project where I know I need
the most immaculate full-gated 35mm or even 65mm negative to best serve
the story. Other times, like on 28 Days Later or [von Trier-directed Dogme 95 production] Celebration, it makes the most sense to go with Mini DV. I don't want to leave any of it behind."
| COMMENTS (1) | | 06/23/2009 | | Thomas Vinterberg is the director of Celebration and not Lars von Trier. Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg drafted the "Vow of Chastity" that was the founding document for the Dogme 95 movement. |
|
|
|
More...
|
|
|
|
|